The Daily Southerner, Tarboro, NC

Opinion

May 1, 2013

Favoring Immigrants over Citizens

PINETOPS —  Should Immigrants ever be given more favorable treatment than those of us who are already U.S. citizens?  Apparently President Obama believes this should be the case when it comes to Obamacare. When it comes to the terms of the immigration reform bill and Obamacare almost 11 million illegals will be given a provisional legal status to live and work in this country.

This legal status means they will be classified as ‘not lawfully present’ under Obamacare. This group is not required under Obamacare to obtain health insurance nor are they eligible for Obamacare tax credits. Neither will employees who hire them be required to provide health insurance for them. The catch is the employers will enjoy a $3,000 savings by hiring these immigrants over hiring U.S. citizens.  With this new status for these immigrants the U.S. citizens take a back seat behind these ‘not lawfully present’ individuals.

Here’s how the whole thing works. Employers who don’t offer insurance face fines based on full-time staffing levels, regardless of whether the workers are immigrants or U.S. citizens. However, employers who offer insurance can face fines if the coverage costs workers more than 9.5 percent of their pay. This could be expensive for small companies. However if the insurance is too costly, the worker will be eligible for Obamacare.

    But, once the employee goes on Obamacare the employer will be charged, by the government, up to $3,000 per full-time worker who receives Obamacare subsidies. However the so called ‘legalized immigrants’ are not eligible for Obamacare, so their employers would not be fined for hiring them and not subsidizing their insurance. What it all boils down to is an employer is encouraged to hire provisionally legal immigrants over U.S. citizens because it saves the employer money with Obamacare.

    So we see that a combination of the immigration reform bill and Obamacare could cause the U.S. citizens a more difficult time of finding a job and in some cases actually cost them a job. How many jobs could this cost U.S. citizens? We really don’t know, but it’s been estimated it could go up to the millions.

    An example of this type of anti-U.S. citizen plan could be that an employer who employs maybe 30 or so non-high level skilled employees could replace these U.S. citizens with provisionally legal immigrants and save his company up to $90,000 a year by not having to provide the new hires (provisionally legal immigrants) with health coverage. This could be very attractive for a struggling company…and there are a lot of struggling companies now.

    Could there be a political motive behind all this? Well if it’s political, and most things that are political have a political motive behind them. The vast majority of the immigrants we’re talking about are Hispanic and because of our president’s immigration policies he received about 75 percent of the Hispanic vote in the last election and his political party would like to keep this voting bloc tied up and in their pocket. When they can wrap up about 11 million votes, to them it’s a no-brainer.

    No matter how many votes the president and his political party might expect from the Hispanics there is a looming giant of a problem that could cost them dearly in future votes. It still has to do with Obamacare, not as it affects Hispanics, but how it affects the rest of us. The problems with Obamacare have already started. The IRS has already issued regulations that show that the cheapest insurance plan under Obamacare will cost a family of five $20,000 per year by 2016.

    Low-income families have already seen their premium increase and they’ll increase a lot more in the near future. The president promised that Obamacare would reduce health care insurance by 14 percent to 20 percent, but instead it has jumped by percent. That means the average person pays around $400 a month out of their pocket.

    Obamacare also includes a number of mandates that increase the cost of healthcare insurance, such as birth control. This could be purchased locally for only $9 per month but when you run it through Obamacare the cost is multiplied many times. Only those individuals who make less than $15,302 per year or $31,155 for a family of four will be eligible for Medicaid to pay for Obamacare. So unless you are making $7.35 an hour or less you’ll probably be paying something for Obamacare.

    Efficiency is penalized with Obamacare. Why not? Our government is run so inefficiently that efficiency is looked down on. The states that operate the most efficiently run healthcare will face the steepest increases, from 65 percent to 100 percent. And people wonder why some states have opted out of implementing Obamacare.

    Beginning in 2014 families that do not purchase healthcare insurance will be fined either $2,085 or 2.5 percent of their income. What happened to freedom?  When citizens begin to fully realize what Obamacare is costing them, the president and his party may have to pay dearly.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • The legacy of Joe W. Dickens Jr.'s dash

    Joe W. Dickens Jr.
    Sept. 14, 1953 - March 21, 2014
    The above statement is profound in its own way. It signifies the birth and the death of one of the most influential men in Edgecombe Coun

    March 31, 2014

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    On July 28, 911 was called because my husband had a bad headache. I was transferred to communications in Edgecombe County, where I spoke to a female operator. I informed her I needed Rescue because my husband had a bad headache and gave her our address and telephone number.

    September 26, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    Sheriff Knight’s “guys” may have worked hard on the case concerning Melvin Ray Fox, but did they really? Probably not for the sheriff, but for someone else behind the scenes. Not condoning Mr. Fox for his crime, because he should be punished, but not necessarily in the manner of leaving behind his wife as well as his 3-, 5- 7- and 13-year-old children.

    September 10, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    Concerning the Tarboro High 2013 Vikings football team: They have heart and desire. That was shown Friday night versus Washington. Just like last year’s state championship game, we got behind against a very good team. The Vikings didn’t quit even though they had several injuries throughout the game.  Right up to the last minute we had a chance  but, things didn’t go our way.

    September 5, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    It appears Mr. (Garland) Shepheard is shaking up things in our fair city according to a recent Daily Southerner article. Hurrah for him. This citizen, for one, believes the status quo needs a little shake up.
    I don’t know if Mr. Shepheard is disrespectful with his words and/or
    actions at council meetings or not. I don’t attend them any longer. It isn’t that I don’t care that some residents may suggest.

    September 4, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    Having just recently read the front page article in The Daily Southerner regarding Councilman Shepheard’s issues with the Tarboro town manager, I was left with more questions than answers.
    The article states that  Mr. Shepheard’s reasons for not voting in favor of extending the town manager’s contract had to do with “deplorable conditions of three town facilities, Thornton’s hiring practices and giving the council what he said was false information.” That’s it.  That’s all the information we were given.

    September 2, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    So who are you Mr. Allen Dennie Jr.? I have never heard of you. I have tried to find your voter registration on the North Carolina State Board of Elections website and I can't find it.
    Somebody said that you have an impressive resume. I say and ?
    But what I find interesting is the following. Mr. Dennie the current Sheriff is the following: "The sheriff of any county should be a person who has a personal interest in the citizens that work live and visit their county,"

    August 18, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    I am glad that opinions are being expressed regarding my actions at the Town Council meetings,  both by Mr. Walker and Mr. Wooten.
    It is my intention to expose the concerns expressed to me by the taxpayers of Tarboro, and when I find something that causes Tarboro not to be the Town we can all be proud of, I will speak up. I was told by people in Ward 8 when I ran for this office not to be like the rest of the Council and I expressed that to the members. The problems that exist in Tarboro should not have to be aired in public or at the Town Council Meetings and there should not be any discord.

    August 18, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    I am writing out of concern about disc golf. We as a town need to consider projects that have been given to (parks and recreation director) Cheryl Gay before this disc golf came along — like a walking trail at Clark Park, repairing the bathrooms, making sure the playground equipment is up-to-date and finding out what happen to the lights on the baseball field before we find money for disc golf. The town needs to consider what we been discussing in these last couple of meetings about recreation. I would love to see the Clark Park baseball field turned into a kickball field, which is a sport that everybody knows how to play, before you consider disc golf.
    Greg Higgs,
    Tarboro

    August 15, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR

    To the Editor:
    Monday night at the Town Council meeting (Aug. 12, 2013), I witnessed some the most disruptive,vitriolic and asinine behavior that I’ve ever seen, in the person of (Ward 8) councilman Garland Shepheard.  For several months, his behavior has grown progressively worse and it seems to embolden him to waste my time, the time of the other council members and the time of other citizens who care enough about Tarboro to attend council meetings.

    August 15, 2013